SRI. POREDDY NAGENDRA REDDY, vs THE UNION OF INDIA Advocate - SURESH H S — WP/17354/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: KAHC010385022026

Filing Number

WP/17505/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/17354/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

B M Shyam Prasad

Coram

B M Shyam Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

MVT-Motor Vehicles Taxation Act ( 117 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI. POREDDY NAGENDRA REDDY,

    Adv. BHADRI R @ BHADRINATH R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA Advocate - SURESH H S

  2. 2.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

  3. 3.THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTS DEPARTMENT

  4. 4.THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTS (ENFORCEMENT)

  5. 5.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TRANSPORTS (ENFORCEMENT)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jul-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    B M Shyam Prasad

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    B M Shyam PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 17354/2026 The Karnataka High Court ordered that respondents cannot seize petitioner Poreddy Nagendra Reddy's vehicle over a road tax dispute, but retained liberty to inspect it. If inspection reveals the vehicle is being used as a transport vehicle to ferry passengers within or across states, authorities may raise a tax demand subject to further court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17354/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 17354/2026 The Karnataka High Court ordered that respondents cannot seize petitioner Poreddy Nagendra Reddy's vehicle over a road tax dispute, but retained liberty to inspect it. If inspection reveals the vehicle is being used as a transport vehicle to ferry passengers within or across states, authorities may raise a tax demand subject to further court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case