SRI. ANANDA C vs STATE BY BANGALORE RURAL DCRE PS — CRL.P/7972/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2), 352, 118(1) 351(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010379602026

Filing Number

CRL.P/7952/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRL.P/7972/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

S Vishwajith Shetty

Coram

S Vishwajith Shetty

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.P ( 112 )

Sub-Category

438(Cr.PC) / 482(BNSS)-U/S 438/-U/S 482 ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2), 352, 118(1) 351(2)
The Scheduled Castes and the Schedules Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r)(s)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI. ANANDA C

    Adv. B M LOKESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE BY BANGALORE RURAL DCRE PS (Police Station)

  2. 2.SMT. PRAMILA

  3. 3.SRI. SHASHIKUNAR

  4. 4.SRI RANGARAJU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    S Vishwajith ShettyView PDF

    Case Summary: CRL.P 7972/2026 Sri Ananda C sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 in a case registered by Bangalore Rural DCRE Police Station involving charges under SC/ST (POA) Amendment Ordinance 2014 and various BNS sections. The petitioner's counsel filed a memo requesting withdrawal of the petition, which the High Court granted. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time

    S Vishwajith Shetty

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.P/7972/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRL.P 7972/2026 Sri Ananda C sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 in a case registered by Bangalore Rural DCRE Police Station involving charges under SC/ST (POA) Amendment Ordinance 2014 and various BNS sections. The petitioner's counsel filed a memo requesting withdrawal of the petition, which the High Court granted. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case