SRI JAGADISH J G vs THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER — WP/17300/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: KAHC010378742026

Filing Number

WP/17203/2026

Filing Date

06-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/17300/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

B M Shyam Prasad

Coram

B M Shyam Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

RES-Residuary ( 91 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI JAGADISH J G

    Adv. KRISHNAMURTHY M R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  2. 2.PANCHYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, JINNAGARA GRAMA PANCHYA

  3. 3.SMT MAYAMMA,

    Adv. K. VIJAYA KUMAR

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    B M Shyam Prasad

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    B M Shyam PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 17300/2026 The writ petition filed by Sri Jagadish J G against the Executive Officer and Panchayat Development Officer of Jinnagara Grama Panchayat and Smt Mayamma was heard on 12.06.2026. The case was adjourned as requested by the petitioner's counsel and scheduled for next hearing on 02.07.2026. The court directed the office to record the name of the counsel who entered caveat for the third respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17300/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 17300/2026 The writ petition filed by Sri Jagadish J G against the Executive Officer and Panchayat Development Officer of Jinnagara Grama Panchayat and Smt Mayamma was heard on 12.06.2026. The case was adjourned as requested by the petitioner's counsel and scheduled for next hearing on 02.07.2026. The court directed the office to record the name of the counsel who entered caveat for the third respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case