SRI. VEERAPPA vs SRI. SHAAMU — WP/17608/2021
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC010358382021
Filing Number
WP/15004/2021
Filing Date
23-Sep-2021
Registration No
WP/17608/2021
Registration Date
25-Sep-2021
Judge
Vijaykumar A. Patil
Coram
Vijaykumar A. Patil
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 144 )
Sub-Category
CPC-Civil Procedure Code ( 24 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI. VEERAPPA
Adv. SUBHASH SRINIVASA RANGACHAR
-
2.SRI MANJUNATH @ MANU
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRI. SHAAMU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Vijaykumar A. PatilView PDF
Case Summary The Karnataka High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the trial court's order appointing a Court Commissioner to inspect neighboring properties in a property dispute case. The court upheld the appointment, finding that physical inspection and measurement were necessary to determine factual issues—specifically whether defendants left adequate setback space and erected windows/ventilators on their property boundary wall—which were disputed by parties despite undisputed ownership claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
Vijaykumar A. Patil
-
09-Dec-2025
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
S Vishwajith Shetty
-
20-Nov-2025
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
S Vishwajith Shetty
-
29-Oct-2025
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
S Vishwajith Shetty
-
27-Oct-2025
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
S Vishwajith Shetty
-
16-Oct-2025
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
S Vishwajith Shetty
-
14-Oct-2025
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
S Vishwajith Shetty
-
08-Oct-2025
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
K.manmadha Rao
-
01-Dec-2021
Orders
B M Shyam Prasad
-
09-Nov-2021
Preliminary Hearing
B M Shyam Prasad
-
27-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Sep-2021
Case filed
Registration No. WP/17608/2021
Case Summary The Karnataka High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the trial court's order appointing a Court Commissioner to inspect neighboring properties in a property dispute case. The court upheld the appointment, finding that physical inspection and measurement were necessary to determine factual issues—specifically whether defendants left adequate setback space and erected windows/ventilators on their property boundary wall—which were disputed by parties despite undisputed ownership claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts