SRI.DIWAKAR SHETTY vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — RP/621/2022
Case under None Section NONE. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC010356042022
Filing Number
RP/319/2022
Filing Date
03-Aug-2022
Registration No
RP/621/2022
Registration Date
06-Aug-2022
Judge
B M Shyam Prasad
Coram
B M Shyam Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI.DIWAKAR SHETTY
Adv. GIRIDHAR H
-
2.SRI RAVIRAJ SHETTY
-
3.SMT SUPRITHA R SHETTY
-
4.SMT ASHAJYOTHI RAI
-
5.sri k ajith kumar rai
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
-
2.THE MANGALORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Hearing - Interlocutory Appln
B M Shyam Prasad
-
09-Jun-2026
B M Shyam PrasadView PDF
Case RP/621/2022 Summary: The review petition by Diwakar Shetty and others challenging non-implementation of the revised master plan was adjourned. The court noted the petitioners' counsel's submission that contrary to the respondent's claims, the revised master plan has not been implemented. Since the second respondent (Mangalore Urban Development Authority) failed to appear, the case was re-listed for hearing on 16.06.2026 to provide another opportunity for their response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Hearing - Interlocutory Appln
M.i.arun
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing - Interlocutory Appln
Suraj Govindaraj
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing - Interlocutory Appln
Suraj Govindaraj
-
11-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. RP/621/2022
Case RP/621/2022 Summary: The review petition by Diwakar Shetty and others challenging non-implementation of the revised master plan was adjourned. The court noted the petitioners' counsel's submission that contrary to the respondent's claims, the revised master plan has not been implemented. Since the second respondent (Mangalore Urban Development Authority) failed to appear, the case was re-listed for hearing on 16.06.2026 to provide another opportunity for their response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts