SMT BHARATHI vs SMT JANAKAMMA — WP/16606/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED AND REMANDED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010355942026

Filing Number

WP/16357/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/16606/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Lalitha Kanneganti

Coram

Lalitha Kanneganti

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

CPC-Civil Procedure Code ( 24 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED AND REMANDED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT BHARATHI

    Adv. D. NAGARAJA

  2. 2.SMT. BHAVYA

  3. 3.SRI. JNANESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT JANAKAMMA

  2. 2.SMT. RATHNAMMA

  3. 3.SM. CHUDAMANI BH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Lalitha KannegantiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 16606/2026 The High Court of Karnataka allowed the defendants' writ petition and set aside the trial court's dismissal of their application to recall PW-1 (plaintiff) for further cross-examination in a will validity case. Justice Lalitha Kanneganti held that since the plaintiffs are also beneficiaries of the disputed will and an additional issue on will validity was newly framed by the appellate order, cross-examining PW-1 would not prejudice plaintiffs but would facilitate defendants' proof of the will. The court remanded the matter with strict timelines: cross-examination on 08.06.2026 (concluding same day) and all further evidence by 12.06.2026, directing no adjournments thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Preliminary Hearing

    Lalitha Kanneganti

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16606/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 16606/2026 The High Court of Karnataka allowed the defendants' writ petition and set aside the trial court's dismissal of their application to recall PW-1 (plaintiff) for further cross-examination in a will validity case. Justice Lalitha Kanneganti held that since the plaintiffs are also beneficiaries of the disputed will and an additional issue on will validity was newly framed by the appellate order, cross-examining PW-1 would not prejudice plaintiffs but would facilitate defendants' proof of the will. The court remanded the matter with strict timelines: cross-examination on 08.06.2026 (concluding same day) and all further evidence by 12.06.2026, directing no adjournments thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case