SRI LAKHVEER SINGH vs THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER — WP/15437/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.
CNR: KAHC010339712026
Filing Number
WP/15566/2026
Filing Date
13-May-2026
Registration No
WP/15437/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
B M Shyam Prasad
Coram
B M Shyam Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 144 )
Sub-Category
RES-Residuary ( 91 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI LAKHVEER SINGH
Adv. PARAMESWARAIAH D. C.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
-
2.THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,
-
3.THE HAP REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,
Case History
-
27-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Jul-2026
Preliminary Hearing
B M Shyam Prasad
-
08-Jun-2026
B M Shyam PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: WP 15437/2026 The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard the writ petition filed by Sri Lakhveer Singh against the Executive Officer, Panchayath Development Officer, and HAP Realtors Private Limited on 08.06.2026. The court accepted notice for the first and second respondents and issued an emergent notice returnable by 27.07.2026 to the third respondent. The petitioner's counsel was directed to serve copies of the petition and annexures on the Standing counsel's chambers at the earliest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Orders
S.r.krishna Kumar
-
14-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/15437/2026
Case Summary: WP 15437/2026 The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard the writ petition filed by Sri Lakhveer Singh against the Executive Officer, Panchayath Development Officer, and HAP Realtors Private Limited on 08.06.2026. The court accepted notice for the first and second respondents and issued an emergent notice returnable by 27.07.2026 to the third respondent. The petitioner's counsel was directed to serve copies of the petition and annexures on the Standing counsel's chambers at the earliest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts