SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR vs SRI. G S KEMPEGOWDA — CRL.RP/821/2020

Case under The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010338552020

Filing Number

CRL.RP/801/2020

Filing Date

07-Nov-2020

Registration No

CRL.RP/821/2020

Registration Date

21-Dec-2020

Judge

H.p.sandesh

Coram

H.p.sandesh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.RP ( 114 )

Sub-Category

397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)-U/S 397/-U/S 438 ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR

    Adv. B H DAYANANDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI. G S KEMPEGOWDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    H.p.sandeshView PDF

    The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Naveen Kumar's Criminal Revision Petition seeking to set aside a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court found that Kumar failed to comply with a conditional order dated 05.01.2021 requiring him to deposit 50% of the cheque amount before the Trial Court within four weeks, and therefore declined to consider the revision petition on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Feb-2024

    Admission

    S Rachaiah

  4. 22-Dec-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Nov-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.RP/821/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Naveen Kumar's Criminal Revision Petition seeking to set aside a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court found that Kumar failed to comply with a conditional order dated 05.01.2021 requiring him to deposit 50% of the cheque amount before the Trial Court within four weeks, and therefore declined to consider the revision petition on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case