MR H HARISH SALIAN vs SHRI POORNANANDA VIVIDODDESHA SOUHARDHA SAHARKI LTD — CRL.RP/773/2026
Case under None Section NONE. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC010331922026
Filing Number
CRL.RP/767/2026
Filing Date
07-05-2026
Registration No
CRL.RP/773/2026
Registration Date
07-05-2026
Judge
H.P.SANDESH
Coram
H.P.SANDESH
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.RP ( 114 )
Sub-Category
397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)-U/S 397/-U/S 438 ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MR H HARISH SALIAN
Adv. JEEVAN K
Respondent(s)
SHRI POORNANANDA VIVIDODDESHA SOUHARDHA SAHARKI LTD
Hearing History
Judge: H.P.SANDESH
NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME |
Orders
CASE SUMMARY: CRL.RP 773/2026 The Karnataka High Court dismissed Mr. H. Harish Salian's criminal revision petition challenging his conviction by the trial court and appellate court. The court found that Salian issued a cheque for Rs. 6,93,850 pursuant to a joint memorandum (Ex.P7) to repay a due amount, failed to respond to notice, provided no defence evidence, and offered nothing in cross-examination. Justice H.P. Sandesh held the cheque was issued based on the agreed joint memo, found no grounds for revision, and dismissed both the delay condonation application and sentence suspension application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: CRL.RP 773/2026 The Karnataka High Court dismissed Mr. H. Harish Salian's criminal revision petition challenging his conviction by the trial court and appellate court. The court found that Salian issued a cheque for Rs. 6,93,850 pursuant to a joint memorandum (Ex.P7) to repay a due amount, failed to respond to notice, provided no defence evidence, and offered nothing in cross-examination. Justice H.P. Sandesh held the cheque was issued based on the agreed joint memo, found no grounds for revision, and dismissed both the delay condonation application and sentence suspension application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts