MR H HARISH SALIAN vs SHRI POORNANANDA VIVIDODDESHA SOUHARDHA SAHARKI LTD — CRL.RP/773/2026

Case under None Section NONE. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010331922026

Filing Number

CRL.RP/767/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

CRL.RP/773/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

H.p.sandesh

Coram

H.p.sandesh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.RP ( 114 )

Sub-Category

397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)-U/S 397/-U/S 438 ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

None Section NONE

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR H HARISH SALIAN

    Adv. JEEVAN K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI POORNANANDA VIVIDODDESHA SOUHARDHA SAHARKI LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    H.p.sandeshView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CRL.RP 773/2026 The Karnataka High Court dismissed Mr. H. Harish Salian's criminal revision petition challenging his conviction by the trial court and appellate court. The court found that Salian issued a cheque for Rs. 6,93,850 pursuant to a joint memorandum (Ex.P7) to repay a due amount, failed to respond to notice, provided no defence evidence, and offered nothing in cross-examination. Justice H.P. Sandesh held the cheque was issued based on the agreed joint memo, found no grounds for revision, and dismissed both the delay condonation application and sentence suspension application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time

    M.G.S. Kamal

  4. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.RP/773/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CRL.RP 773/2026 The Karnataka High Court dismissed Mr. H. Harish Salian's criminal revision petition challenging his conviction by the trial court and appellate court. The court found that Salian issued a cheque for Rs. 6,93,850 pursuant to a joint memorandum (Ex.P7) to repay a due amount, failed to respond to notice, provided no defence evidence, and offered nothing in cross-examination. Justice H.P. Sandesh held the cheque was issued based on the agreed joint memo, found no grounds for revision, and dismissed both the delay condonation application and sentence suspension application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case