SRINIVASA vs STATE OF KARNATAKA BY — CRL.A/804/2026

Case under The Scheduled Castes and the Schedules Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2) (va). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010328572026

Filing Number

CRL.A/783/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CRL.A/804/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

S Rachaiah

Coram

S Rachaiah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.A ( 110 )

Sub-Category

U/S 14(A) (2)-(A) (2) of SC and ST ACT ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Scheduled Castes and the Schedules Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2) (va)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 351(2), 118(1), 352,3(5), 79

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRINIVASA

    Adv. MANOJ H C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

  2. 2.NANJUNDAIAH,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    S RachaiahView PDF

    Summary of CRL.A No. 804/2026: Srinivasa filed a criminal appeal under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2015, challenging a bail denial order dated 28.04.2026 in a case involving charges under SC/ST atrocities provisions and BNS sections. However, the appellant's counsel filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal, which the High Court of Karnataka accepted, resulting in dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Admission

    S Rachaiah

  4. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.A/804/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRL.A No. 804/2026: Srinivasa filed a criminal appeal under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2015, challenging a bail denial order dated 28.04.2026 in a case involving charges under SC/ST atrocities provisions and BNS sections. However, the appellant's counsel filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal, which the High Court of Karnataka accepted, resulting in dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case