SRI. SUMAN N P vs STATE OF KARNATAKA — WP/13337/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC010301332025
Filing Number
WP/14095/2025
Filing Date
26-Apr-2025
Registration No
WP/13337/2025
Registration Date
28-Apr-2025
Judge
M.nagaprasanna
Coram
M.nagaprasanna
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 144 )
Sub-Category
482 ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI. SUMAN N P
Adv. VINAYAK VAMANRAO KULKARNI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
M.nagaprasannaView PDF
Case Summary: WP 13337/2025 - Sri. Suman N P v. State of Karnataka The High Court of Karnataka allowed the writ petition and ordered release of a seized Maxi Cab Urbana vehicle to petitioner Suman N P on conditional basis. The petitioner, accused in a fraud case involving fake property sale documents, had sought vehicle release after lower courts rejected his application under CrPC Sections 451-457. Justice M. Nagaprasanna, relying on Supreme Court precedent (*Perichi Gounder v. Tamil Nadu*), held that prolonged seizure damages vehicles and serves no one's interest, directing release subject to indemnity bond, surety, non-transfer undertaking, and vehicle production when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Dec-2025
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
Mohammad Nawaz
-
01-Dec-2025
Preliminary Hearing - B Group
Mohammad Nawaz
-
25-Nov-2025
Preliminary Hearing
Mohammad Nawaz
-
07-Jul-2025
Preliminary Hearing
S.r.krishna Kumar
-
29-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/13337/2025
Case Summary: WP 13337/2025 - Sri. Suman N P v. State of Karnataka The High Court of Karnataka allowed the writ petition and ordered release of a seized Maxi Cab Urbana vehicle to petitioner Suman N P on conditional basis. The petitioner, accused in a fraud case involving fake property sale documents, had sought vehicle release after lower courts rejected his application under CrPC Sections 451-457. Justice M. Nagaprasanna, relying on Supreme Court precedent (*Perichi Gounder v. Tamil Nadu*), held that prolonged seizure damages vehicles and serves no one's interest, directing release subject to indemnity bond, surety, non-transfer undertaking, and vehicle production when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts