MR. PARAMESHWARA. K vs THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., Advocate - FRANCIS XAVIER — WP/13279/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010289922026

Filing Number

WP/13180/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/13279/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Jyoti M

Coram

Jyoti M

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

DRT-Debts Recovery Tribunals Act ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226, 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR. PARAMESHWARA. K

    Adv. AKKAMAHADEVI HIREMATH

  2. 2.SMT.. VIDYA,

  3. 3.MISS. P. LAVANYA,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., Advocate - FRANCIS XAVIER

  2. 2.MR. AJAY. S S GUPTA (HUF)

  3. 3.M/S. SWARNAMANDIR JEWEL DESIGNER PVT. LTD.,

  4. 4.SRI. KISHOOR KUMAR P

  5. 5.SMT. SHOBHA KISHOR,

  6. 6.SRI. ADITYA KISHOR,

  7. 7.SRI. JAGADISH. K,

  8. 8.SRI. KUMARESH,

  9. 9.SRI. P. MOHAN RAJ,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Jyoti MView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 13279/2026 Court Decision: The Karnataka High Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the DRT's dismissal order dated 08.04.2026 in appeal S.A.13/2026. The court directed the petitioners to amend the cause title within two days and instructed the DRT to permit and expeditiously dispose of the application. Key Issue & Reasoning: The original appellant Parameshwara died during the DRT appeal, and an application to substitute his legal heirs was granted. However, despite sufficient adjournments and opportunities, the petitioners failed to carry out the required amendment to the cause title. The DRT consequently dismissed the appeal. The High Court found merit in setting aside this dismissal order, particularly as the respondent (auction purchaser) consented to the relief, and directed immediate corrective action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Preliminary Hearing

    Lalitha Kanneganti

  4. 25-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/13279/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 13279/2026 Court Decision: The Karnataka High Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the DRT's dismissal order dated 08.04.2026 in appeal S.A.13/2026. The court directed the petitioners to amend the cause title within two days and instructed the DRT to permit and expeditiously dispose of the application. Key Issue & Reasoning: The original appellant Parameshwara died during the DRT appeal, and an application to substitute his legal heirs was granted. However, despite sufficient adjournments and opportunities, the petitioners failed to carry out the required amendment to the cause title. The DRT consequently dismissed the appeal. The High Court found merit in setting aside this dismissal order, particularly as the respondent (auction purchaser) consented to the relief, and directed immediate corrective action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case