SURESH KUMAR GANNA vs THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAXES — WP/12616/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
CNR: KAHC010280312026
Filing Number
WP/12728/2026
Filing Date
16-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/12616/2026
Registration Date
21-Apr-2026
Judge
B M Shyam Prasad
Coram
B M Shyam Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 144 )
Sub-Category
RES-Residuary ( 112 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURESH KUMAR GANNA
Adv. ANNAMALAI S
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAXES
-
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CIRCLE-
-
3.THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL TAX RANGE DSD-2
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jul-2026
Preliminary Hearing
B M Shyam Prasad
-
09-Jun-2026
B M Shyam PrasadView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: WP 12616/2026 The petition by Suresh Kumar Ganna challenging a GST Order-in-Original dated 22.09.2023 was partially allowed. The High Court of Karnataka granted an interim order in petitioner's favour, permitting him to deposit an additional 10% of the tax demand and produce documents to demonstrate that Input Tax Credit reversed in September 2018 pertains to the GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A difference for 2017-18 only. The respondents were directed to show cause by 08.07.2026 as to why the petition should not be favoured on the requested terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Fresh Matter/S
S Sunil Dutt Yadav
-
22-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/12616/2026
CASE SUMMARY: WP 12616/2026 The petition by Suresh Kumar Ganna challenging a GST Order-in-Original dated 22.09.2023 was partially allowed. The High Court of Karnataka granted an interim order in petitioner's favour, permitting him to deposit an additional 10% of the tax demand and produce documents to demonstrate that Input Tax Credit reversed in September 2018 pertains to the GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A difference for 2017-18 only. The respondents were directed to show cause by 08.07.2026 as to why the petition should not be favoured on the requested terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts