ARVIND KUMAR R vs STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/5800/2026
Case under None Section NONE. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC010272662026
Filing Number
CRL.P/5934/2026
Filing Date
10-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRL.P/5800/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
M.nagaprasanna
Coram
M.nagaprasanna
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.P ( 112 )
Sub-Category
482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)-U/S 482/-U/S 528 ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
11-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARVIND KUMAR R
Adv. S JAGAN BABU
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF KARNATAKA
-
2.ASHA N
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Apr-2026
M.nagaprasannaView PDF
The Karnataka High Court quashed a 14-day police custody order granted on April 9, 2026, finding it violated procedural law since valid anticipatory bail granted in December 2025 was still in subsistence. The court held that merely adding new offenses (KPIDFE Act charges) to an FIR does not automatically extinguish anticipatory bail; the prosecution must formally apply for its cancellation after proper hearing before police custody can be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Apr-2026
Orders
M.nagaprasanna
-
10-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRL.P/5800/2026
The Karnataka High Court quashed a 14-day police custody order granted on April 9, 2026, finding it violated procedural law since valid anticipatory bail granted in December 2025 was still in subsistence. The court held that merely adding new offenses (KPIDFE Act charges) to an FIR does not automatically extinguish anticipatory bail; the prosecution must formally apply for its cancellation after proper hearing before police custody can be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts