MR SUNDAR RAJU vs B.B.M.P — WP/12083/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: KAHC010265482026

Filing Number

WP/12069/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/12083/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

B M Shyam Prasad

Coram

B M Shyam Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

BMP-Bangalore Mahanagara Palike ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR SUNDAR RAJU

    Adv. RAKSHITH R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.B.B.M.P

  2. 2.JOINT COMMISIONER

  3. 3.ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING(SOUTH)

  4. 4.ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

  5. 5.SMT. BHAGYAMMA,

  6. 6.MR. GANESH C.

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    B M Shyam Prasad

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    B M Shyam PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 12083/2026 The petition was adjourned for further hearing. The court directed the third respondent (Assistant Director of Town Planning) to file a report on action taken regarding the petitioner's complaint about neighbors' unauthorized construction violating setback regulations, or explain reasons for inaction. Notice was issued to the fifth and sixth respondents (neighboring constructors) returnable by 12.06.2026, and the petitioner retained liberty to seek interim orders at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/12083/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 12083/2026 The petition was adjourned for further hearing. The court directed the third respondent (Assistant Director of Town Planning) to file a report on action taken regarding the petitioner's complaint about neighbors' unauthorized construction violating setback regulations, or explain reasons for inaction. Notice was issued to the fifth and sixth respondents (neighboring constructors) returnable by 12.06.2026, and the petitioner retained liberty to seek interim orders at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case