SRI CHIRAG SHETTY vs SUNDEEP LEO ALMEIDA — MFA/3581/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173(1). Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jul-2026

CNR: KAHC010264092023

Filing Number

MFA/3544/2023

Filing Date

29-May-2023

Registration No

MFA/3581/2023

Registration Date

01-Jun-2023

Judge

Shivashankar Amarannavar

Coram

Shivashankar Amarannavar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MFA ( 124 )

Sub-Category

CA-Claimants Appeal ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI CHIRAG SHETTY

    Adv. H PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNDEEP LEO ALMEIDA

  2. 2.THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD

    Adv. SUDHAKAR REDDY S V,SHANKARA REDDY C

  3. 3.BALAKRISHNA RAO

  4. 4.THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD

Case History

  1. 17-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jul-2026

    Orders

    Shivashankar Amarannavar

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF

    In MFA No. 3581/2023, the High Court of Karnataka allowed the appellant's application for condonation of 69 days' delay in filing the appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court dispensed with notice to respondents 1 and 3 at appellant's counsel's risk and directed the registry to secure trial court records. The matter was listed for hearing on 17.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 29-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. MFA/3581/2023

casestatus.in Summary

In MFA No. 3581/2023, the High Court of Karnataka allowed the appellant's application for condonation of 69 days' delay in filing the appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court dispensed with notice to respondents 1 and 3 at appellant's counsel's risk and directed the registry to secure trial court records. The matter was listed for hearing on 17.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case