MATHIKERE SAMPANGI RAMAIAH RAJARAM, vs ASSESSMEN UNIT — WP/10390/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CNR: KAHC010232322026

Filing Number

WP/10472/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/10390/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

B M Shyam Prasad

Coram

B M Shyam Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

IT-Income Tax Act ( 111 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226, 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MATHIKERE SAMPANGI RAMAIAH RAJARAM,

    Adv. ANNAMALAI S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASSESSMEN UNIT

  2. 2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    Preliminary Hearing

    B M Shyam Prasad

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    B M Shyam PrasadView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Karnataka granted an interim order in favor of petitioner Mathikere Sampangi Ramaiah Rajaram on 09.06.2026, challenging an Assessment Order dated 19.03.2026 for assessment year 2024-25. The Income Tax Officer had refused deductions under Sections 54F and 54B, claiming these provisions are mutually exclusive, but the court found this contrary to settled law establishing these provisions are not mutually exclusive. The petition is re-listed for hearing on 24.06.2026 pending the respondents' response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  8. 07-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/10390/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Karnataka granted an interim order in favor of petitioner Mathikere Sampangi Ramaiah Rajaram on 09.06.2026, challenging an Assessment Order dated 19.03.2026 for assessment year 2024-25. The Income Tax Officer had refused deductions under Sections 54F and 54B, claiming these provisions are mutually exclusive, but the court found this contrary to settled law establishing these provisions are not mutually exclusive. The petition is re-listed for hearing on 24.06.2026 pending the respondents' response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case