SRI K VIJAY KUMAR vs SRI M L CHANDRASHEKHARA — CRL.RP/547/2026

Case under None Section NONE. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010229942026

Filing Number

CRL.RP/546/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRL.RP/547/2026

Registration Date

28-Mar-2026

Judge

H.p.sandesh

Coram

H.p.sandesh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.RP ( 114 )

Sub-Category

397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)-U/S 397/-U/S 438 ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

None Section NONE

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI K VIJAY KUMAR

    Adv. BALARAJ V R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI M L CHANDRASHEKHARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    H.p.sandeshView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Karnataka dismissed K. Vijay Kumar's criminal revision petition challenging a lower court judgment dated 14.12.2023. The petitioner's advocate failed to appear on the hearing date (09.06.2026) despite claims of settlement, and the petitioner did not comply with the court's 06.04.2026 order requiring deposit of 50% fine amount by 28.04.2026. Justice H.P. Sandesh found no grounds to continue the petition due to non-compliance and lack of representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Admission

    H.p.sandesh

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Admission

    V Srishananda

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Admission

    V Srishananda

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.RP/547/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Karnataka dismissed K. Vijay Kumar's criminal revision petition challenging a lower court judgment dated 14.12.2023. The petitioner's advocate failed to appear on the hearing date (09.06.2026) despite claims of settlement, and the petitioner did not comply with the court's 06.04.2026 order requiring deposit of 50% fine amount by 28.04.2026. Justice H.P. Sandesh found no grounds to continue the petition due to non-compliance and lack of representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case