TRIGUNA MAYURI REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED vs STATE OF KARNATAKA — WA/1003/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010219492026

Filing Number

WA/992/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

WA/1003/2026

Registration Date

26-Mar-2026

Judge

D K Singh , T.m.nadaf

Coram

D K Singh , T.m.nadaf

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 145 )

Sub-Category

KIADB-Kar.Industrial Area Devpt.Board ( 189 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TRIGUNA MAYURI REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. RAJESWARA.P.N

  2. 2.SRI VENU.B.M,

  3. 3.SRI SHIVASHANKAR,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KARNATAKA

  2. 2.THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,

  3. 3.SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

  4. 4.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER - 2

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    D K Singh,t.m.nadafView PDF

    The Karnataka High Court disposed of the writ appeal filed by Triguna Mayuri Realty and others challenging the Single Judge's order that remitted the land acquisition matter back to the Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO) for reconsideration. The court upheld the remand order but directed the SLAO to independently consider objections without being bound by the lower court's interpretation of relevant circulars, and fixed 27.04.2026 for the parties to appear before the SLAO. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    D K Singh , T.m.nadaf

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/1003/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Karnataka High Court disposed of the writ appeal filed by Triguna Mayuri Realty and others challenging the Single Judge's order that remitted the land acquisition matter back to the Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO) for reconsideration. The court upheld the remand order but directed the SLAO to independently consider objections without being bound by the lower court's interpretation of relevant circulars, and fixed 27.04.2026 for the parties to appear before the SLAO. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case