PARVEEN vs THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, — WPHC/29/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 14601. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010215762026

Filing Number

WPHC/29/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPHC/29/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Anu Sivaraman , Venkatesh Naik T

Coram

Anu Sivaraman , Venkatesh Naik T

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14601

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARVEEN

    Adv. BALAKRISHNA M R,IMRAN PASHA,IMRAN PASHA, ,IMRAN PASHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND

  3. 3.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,

  4. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

  5. 5.SMT. JUBEDA

    Adv. CHIDANANDA KEDILAYA M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Anu Sivaraman,venkatesh Naik TView PDF

    The Karnataka High Court dismissed Parveen's habeas corpus petition seeking custody of her minor child from her mother-in-law, finding the matter more appropriately handled by the Family Court where a guardianship case was already pending. The court directed that the NIMHANS counseling report be forwarded to the Family Court in a sealed cover and reserved all parties' rights to approach the Family Court for final orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Anu Sivaraman , Tara Vitasta Ganju

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Hearing - Interlocutory Appln

    Anu Sivaraman , Tara Vitasta Ganju

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Anu Sivaraman , Tara Vitasta Ganju

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPHC/29/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Karnataka High Court dismissed Parveen's habeas corpus petition seeking custody of her minor child from her mother-in-law, finding the matter more appropriately handled by the Family Court where a guardianship case was already pending. The court directed that the NIMHANS counseling report be forwarded to the Family Court in a sealed cover and reserved all parties' rights to approach the Family Court for final orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case