SMT JAYABAI vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/4540/2026

Case under None Section NONE. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010209072026

Filing Number

CRL.P/4550/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRL.P/4540/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

M.nagaprasanna

Coram

M.nagaprasanna

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.P ( 112 )

Sub-Category

482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)-U/S 482/-U/S 528 ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

None Section NONE

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT JAYABAI

    Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR M.G

  2. 2.SRI. RAVINAIK K.L

  3. 3.SRI. SANTHOSH NAIK K.L.

  4. 4.SMT. NEELABAYI

  5. 5.SRI NANJUNDACHAR

  6. 6.SMT SUMITHRA BAI

  7. 7.PADMA BAI K L

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

  2. 2.SMT MUNI BAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    M.nagaprasannaView PDF

    Summary The Karnataka High Court allowed the criminal petition and quashed the trial court's order dated 29.01.2026. The court permitted the accused petitioners to deposit ₹10,000 as witness bhatta (by 27.03.2026) to recall prosecution witnesses PW.9 and PW.18 for cross-examination, recognizing that their failure to deposit the amount by the original deadline was due to inadvertent communication gap rather than willful default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    M.nagaprasanna

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.P/4540/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Karnataka High Court allowed the criminal petition and quashed the trial court's order dated 29.01.2026. The court permitted the accused petitioners to deposit ₹10,000 as witness bhatta (by 27.03.2026) to recall prosecution witnesses PW.9 and PW.18 for cross-examination, recognizing that their failure to deposit the amount by the original deadline was due to inadvertent communication gap rather than willful default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case