THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL vs M/S BHARAT BEEDI WORKS PVT LTD Advocate - TATA KRISHNA — ITA/54/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section NONE. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: KAHC010204922026
Filing Number
ITA/57/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
ITA/54/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Judge
S.g.pandit , K. V. Aravind
Coram
S.g.pandit , K. V. Aravind
Bench Type
Division Bench
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL
Adv. RAVI RAJ Y V
-
2.THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S BHARAT BEEDI WORKS PVT LTD Advocate - TATA KRISHNA
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
S.g.pandit,k. V. AravindView PDF
Summary The High Court of Karnataka admitted multiple Income Tax appeals filed by the Revenue challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's orders that set aside assessment orders for AY 2019-20 and 2020-21 on grounds of mechanical approval under Section 153D of the Act. The court granted interim relief by staying refund of taxes on admitted income (Rs. 119.34 crores for AY 2019-20 and Rs. 127.24 crores for AY 2020-21) pending appeals, holding the Tribunal's automatic refund direction contrary to Section 240(b) and Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Orders
S.g.pandit , K. V. Aravind
-
09-Apr-2026
S.g.pandit,k. V. AravindView PDF
-
27-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ITA/54/2026
Summary The High Court of Karnataka admitted multiple Income Tax appeals filed by the Revenue challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's orders that set aside assessment orders for AY 2019-20 and 2020-21 on grounds of mechanical approval under Section 153D of the Act. The court granted interim relief by staying refund of taxes on admitted income (Rs. 119.34 crores for AY 2019-20 and Rs. 127.24 crores for AY 2020-21) pending appeals, holding the Tribunal's automatic refund direction contrary to Section 240(b) and Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts