M/S G S AND COMPANY vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — WP/8855/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010198662026

Filing Number

WP/8976/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/8855/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

Coram

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

RES-Residuary ( 112 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226, 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S G S AND COMPANY

    Adv. ANGADI S V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

  2. 2.THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,

  3. 3.ASST. COMMISSIONER (GST),

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    S Sunil Dutt YadavView PDF

    Summary The Karnataka High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order against G.S. and Company for wrongful Input Tax Credit (ITC) and alleged non-supply of goods. The court remitted the matter for fresh consideration, permitting the petitioner to file a reply to the show-cause notice with all contentions kept open. The court also set aside the attachment of bank accounts, making any recovered amount subject to the outcome of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/8855/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Karnataka High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order against G.S. and Company for wrongful Input Tax Credit (ITC) and alleged non-supply of goods. The court remitted the matter for fresh consideration, permitting the petitioner to file a reply to the show-cause notice with all contentions kept open. The court also set aside the attachment of bank accounts, making any recovered amount subject to the outcome of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case