SRI MAYAPPA A NANDI vs STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/4091/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80, 85. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010187322026

Filing Number

CRL.P/4071/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRL.P/4091/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Judge

S Rachaiah

Coram

S Rachaiah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.P ( 112 )

Sub-Category

439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)-U/S 439/-U/S 483 ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80, 85
The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI MAYAPPA A NANDI

    Adv. SHREESHAIL ITI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KARNATAKA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Orders

    S Rachaiah

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    S RachaiahView PDF

    The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the criminal petition filed by Sri. Mayappa A Nandi seeking bail in a case involving offences under Sections 80 and 85 of BNS 2023 and Section 4 of the Dangerous Persons Act, 1961. The court found the petition infructuous based on submissions by the petitioner's counsel that the matter had been rendered infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Orders

    S Rachaiah

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Orders

    S Rachaiah

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Orders -1St Time Matters

    S Rachaiah

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.P/4091/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the criminal petition filed by Sri. Mayappa A Nandi seeking bail in a case involving offences under Sections 80 and 85 of BNS 2023 and Section 4 of the Dangerous Persons Act, 1961. The court found the petition infructuous based on submissions by the petitioner's counsel that the matter had been rendered infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case