THE STATE OF KARNATAKA GOVT ADVOCATE vs BRIGADE ENTERPRISES LTD., — WA/901/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC010185722026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
WA/873/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
WA/901/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Judge
Chief Justice , K.S. Hemalekha
Coram
Chief Justice , K.S. Hemalekha
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WA ( 145 )
Sub-Category
ULC-Urban Land Ceiling Act ( 44 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA GOVT ADVOCATE
-
2.STATE OF KARNATAKA
-
3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
-
4.THE TAHSILDAR,
Respondent(s)
-
1.BRIGADE ENTERPRISES LTD.,
-
2.MR. MOIZ SAIFUDDIN VAGH,
-
3.MR.ABDUL HUSSAIN SAIFUDDIN VAGH,
-
4.MR. ABBAS SALEHBHAI VAGH,
-
5.MR. MOHAMMED BHAI TAHER BHAI
-
6.MR. TYEBBHAI SALEHBHAI
-
7.MR ABBASBHAI TAHERBHAI
-
8.SMT KHADIJA HUSSAINI S VAGH
-
9.MR YUSUF H VAGH
-
10.SMT UMAIMA HUNEDHARARWALA
-
11.SMT SHAHER BANU VAGH
-
12.MR. B. SOMASHEKHAR
-
13.MR. K. P. PURUSHOTHAMA
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Writ Appeal Matter/S
Chief Justice , K.S. Hemalekha
-
16-Jun-2026
Chief Justice,k.s. HemalekhaView PDF
Case Summary: WA No. 901/2026 The High Court of Karnataka adjourned the appeal between the State of Karnataka and Brigade Enterprises Ltd. to be heard jointly with related appeals (W.A No. 1405/2023) on 17.06.2026 before a coordinate bench. The court clarified that this adjournment does not constitute condonation of any delay in filing the present appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WA/901/2026
Case Summary: WA No. 901/2026 The High Court of Karnataka adjourned the appeal between the State of Karnataka and Brigade Enterprises Ltd. to be heard jointly with related appeals (W.A No. 1405/2023) on 17.06.2026 before a coordinate bench. The court clarified that this adjournment does not constitute condonation of any delay in filing the present appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts