SRI SUNIL PHILIP vs SMT SMITHA MATHEW Advocate - PRATHIMA S K — MFA/2142/2023

Case under Indian Divorce Act Section 55. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: KAHC010166832023

Filing Number

MFA/2128/2023

Filing Date

27-Mar-2023

Registration No

MFA/2142/2023

Registration Date

29-Mar-2023

Judge

Jayant Banerji , Rajesh Rai K

Coram

Jayant Banerji , Rajesh Rai K

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MFA ( 124 )

Sub-Category

IDA-U/s 55 of Indian Divorce Act ( 53 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Divorce Act Section 55

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI SUNIL PHILIP

    Adv. KIRAN SEBASTIAN ROZARIO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT SMITHA MATHEW Advocate - PRATHIMA S K

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Jayant Banerji,rajesh Rai KView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Karnataka admitted the appeal (MFA No. 2142/2023) in the matrimonial dispute between Sri Sunil Philip and Smt Smitha Mathew. The court conditionally stayed execution proceedings: if the appellant deposits half the permanent alimony amount plus daughters' education expenses within 15 days, execution will remain in abeyance; otherwise, execution will proceed. The matter is listed for final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Nov-2024

    Admission

    Anu Sivaraman , Umesh M Adiga

  4. 31-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. MFA/2142/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Karnataka admitted the appeal (MFA No. 2142/2023) in the matrimonial dispute between Sri Sunil Philip and Smt Smitha Mathew. The court conditionally stayed execution proceedings: if the appellant deposits half the permanent alimony amount plus daughters' education expenses within 15 days, execution will remain in abeyance; otherwise, execution will proceed. The matter is listed for final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case