SMT USHA N SWAMY vs SRI M VENKATASWAMY — RFA/1568/2018

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Oct-2018

CNR: KAHC010159932018

Filing Number

RFA/1568/2018

Filing Date

15-Sep-2018

Registration No

RFA/1568/2018

Registration Date

15-Sep-2018

Judge

D K Singh , T.m.nadaf

Coram

D K Singh , T.m.nadaf

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

RFA ( 132 )

Sub-Category

PAR-Partitions SuIT ( 84 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT USHA N SWAMY

    Adv. KRISHNAMURTHY M R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI M VENKATASWAMY

  2. 2.SMT JAYAMMA

  3. 3.SHYLA VENKATA SWAMY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    D K Singh,t.m.nadafView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: RFA/1568/2018 Court Decision: The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiff's partition suit. Key Reasoning: The court found that the disputed properties (Schedules A, C, and D) were self-acquired properties of the grandfather that were distributed to the father (defendant No.1) through a family partition arrangement, not ancestral joint family properties. Since these were self-acquired properties, not inherited ancestral properties, the plaintiff—as a daughter—had no coparcenary rights and could not claim partition under Hindu succession law, despite the 2005 amendment giving daughters equal coparcenary status in ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Final Hearing

    D K Singh , T.m.nadaf

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Final Hearing

    D K Singh , T.m.nadaf

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    D K Singh , S Rachaiah

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    D K Singh , S Rachaiah

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    D K Singh , Tara Vitasta Ganju

  8. 24-Apr-2025

    Orders

    K.somashekar , Venkatesh Naik T

  9. 09-Apr-2025

    Orders

    K.somashekar , Venkatesh Naik T

  10. 04-Mar-2020

    Admission

    B.v.nagarathna , N S Sanjay Gowda

  11. 04-Nov-2019

    Admission

    B.v.nagarathna , Suraj Govindaraj

  12. 31-Oct-2019

    Admission

    B.v.nagarathna , Suraj Govindaraj

  13. 30-Oct-2019

    Hearing - Interlocutory Appln

    B.v.nagarathna , Suraj Govindaraj

  14. 23-Oct-2019

    Hearing - Interlocutory Appln

    B.v.nagarathna , Suraj Govindaraj

  15. 25-Sep-2019

    Admission

    B.v.nagarathna , Sachin Shankar Magadum

  16. 25-Sep-2019

    Admission

    B.v.nagarathna , Sachin Shankar Magadum

  17. 26-Aug-2019

    Admission

    B.v.nagarathna , Ashok G.nijagannavar

  18. 03-Jul-2019

    Admission

    B.v.nagarathna , K.natarajan

  19. 12-Oct-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 15-Sep-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. RFA/1568/2018

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: RFA/1568/2018 Court Decision: The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiff's partition suit. Key Reasoning: The court found that the disputed properties (Schedules A, C, and D) were self-acquired properties of the grandfather that were distributed to the father (defendant No.1) through a family partition arrangement, not ancestral joint family properties. Since these were self-acquired properties, not inherited ancestral properties, the plaintiff—as a daughter—had no coparcenary rights and could not claim partition under Hindu succession law, despite the 2005 amendment giving daughters equal coparcenary status in ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case