SRI NADEEM AKTHAR vs SRI NATARAJAN Advocate - SRINIVASAN T — CRL.RP/334/2026

Case under The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010142292026

Filing Number

CRL.RP/333/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRL.RP/334/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Judge

H.p.sandesh

Coram

H.p.sandesh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.RP ( 114 )

Sub-Category

397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)-U/S 397/-U/S 438 ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI NADEEM AKTHAR

    Adv. A. S. KULKARNI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI NATARAJAN Advocate - SRINIVASAN T

  2. 2.SMT. NALEENI.N

    Adv. SRINIVASAN T

  3. 3.SRI. MADHU. N

    Adv. SRINIVASAN T

  4. 4.SRI. SHASHIKUMAR,

    Adv. SRINIVASAN T

  5. 5.SMT. GIRIJA.N,

    Adv. SRINIVASAN T

  6. 6.SMT. VANAJA.M,

    Adv. SRINIVASAN T

  7. 7.SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR.N,

    Adv. SRINIVASAN T

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    H.p.sandeshView PDF

    Case Summary: CRL.RP No. 334/2026 The Karnataka High Court dismissed petitioner Nadeem Akthar's criminal revision petition challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court dismissed the petition because Akthar failed to comply with a February 26, 2026 conditional order requiring him to deposit 50% of the fine amount within four weeks as a condition for sentence suspension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Admission

    S Vishwajith Shetty

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.RP/334/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRL.RP No. 334/2026 The Karnataka High Court dismissed petitioner Nadeem Akthar's criminal revision petition challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court dismissed the petition because Akthar failed to comply with a February 26, 2026 conditional order requiring him to deposit 50% of the fine amount within four weeks as a condition for sentence suspension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case