SRI NADEEM AKTHAR vs SRI NATARAJAN Advocate - SRINIVASAN T — CRL.RP/334/2026
Case under The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC010142292026
Filing Number
CRL.RP/333/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
CRL.RP/334/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Judge
H.P.SANDESH
Coram
H.P.SANDESH
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.RP ( 114 )
Sub-Category
397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)-U/S 397/-U/S 438 ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRI NADEEM AKTHAR
Adv. A. S. KULKARNI
Respondent(s)
SRI NATARAJAN Advocate - SRINIVASAN T
SMT. NALEENI.N
Adv. SRINIVASAN T
SRI. MADHU. N
Adv. SRINIVASAN T
SRI. SHASHIKUMAR,
Adv. SRINIVASAN T
SMT. GIRIJA.N,
Adv. SRINIVASAN T
SMT. VANAJA.M,
Adv. SRINIVASAN T
SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR.N,
Adv. SRINIVASAN T
Hearing History
Judge: H.P.SANDESH
ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-02-2026 | ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: CRL.RP No. 334/2026 The Karnataka High Court dismissed petitioner Nadeem Akthar's criminal revision petition challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court dismissed the petition because Akthar failed to comply with a February 26, 2026 conditional order requiring him to deposit 50% of the fine amount within four weeks as a condition for sentence suspension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRL.RP No. 334/2026 The Karnataka High Court dismissed petitioner Nadeem Akthar's criminal revision petition challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court dismissed the petition because Akthar failed to comply with a February 26, 2026 conditional order requiring him to deposit 50% of the fine amount within four weeks as a condition for sentence suspension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts