PAVAN M vs STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/2659/2026

Case under The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 Section 3, 4, 5, 7. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010125472026

Filing Number

CRL.P/2690/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRL.P/2659/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Judge

S Rachaiah

Coram

S Rachaiah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.P ( 112 )

Sub-Category

439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)-U/S 439/-U/S 483 ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 Section 3, 4, 5, 7
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 143

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAVAN M

    Adv. PAVAN KUMAR G

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KARNATAKA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    S RachaiahView PDF

    Summary: The Karnataka High Court granted bail to Pavan M, a 25-year-old accused of running an illegal brothel under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Justice S Rachaiah found the petitioner had made out a case for bail, determining that suitable conditions would address prosecution concerns. The accused was ordered released on a personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh with one surety, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, regular court appearance, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Orders

    S Rachaiah

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.P/2659/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Karnataka High Court granted bail to Pavan M, a 25-year-old accused of running an illegal brothel under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Justice S Rachaiah found the petitioner had made out a case for bail, determining that suitable conditions would address prosecution concerns. The accused was ordered released on a personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh with one surety, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses, regular court appearance, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case