SRI L GUNDU RAO vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — WP/4541/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: KAHC010103402026

Filing Number

WP/4614/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/4541/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Judge

B M Shyam Prasad

Coram

B M Shyam Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

BMP-Bangalore Mahanagara Palike ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226, 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI L GUNDU RAO

    Adv. G R MOHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER

    Adv. B L SANJEEV

  3. 3.THE CHIEF ENGINEER-ZONE 2,

    Adv. B L SANJEEV

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    Orders

    B M Shyam Prasad

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    B M Shyam PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 4541/2026 In this writ petition filed by Sri L Gundu Rao against the State of Karnataka and others, the High Court of Karnataka heard the matter on 05.06.2026 before Justice B M Shyam Prasad. The petition was adjourned and re-listed for 02.07.2026 due to personal inconvenience pleaded by the learned counsel for the second and third respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    Orders

    M.i.arun

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Suraj Govindaraj

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Suraj Govindaraj

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    Suraj Govindaraj

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4541/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 4541/2026 In this writ petition filed by Sri L Gundu Rao against the State of Karnataka and others, the High Court of Karnataka heard the matter on 05.06.2026 before Justice B M Shyam Prasad. The petition was adjourned and re-listed for 02.07.2026 due to personal inconvenience pleaded by the learned counsel for the second and third respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case