SMT. NANDINI B. REDDY vs SRI. SANJAY SUDHEENDRA REDDY Advocate - CHETHAN B — MFA/1056/2026

Case under Family Courts Act Section 19(1). Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Next hearing 27-Apr-2026

CNR: KAHC010098522026

Filing Number

MFA/1070/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

MFA/1056/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Judge

Jayant Banerji , Rajesh Rai K

Coram

Jayant Banerji , Rajesh Rai K

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MFA ( 124 )

Sub-Category

FC-U/s 19 of Family Courts Act ( 49 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Courts Act Section 19(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. NANDINI B. REDDY

    Adv. ARAVIND BASAPPA REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI. SANJAY SUDHEENDRA REDDY Advocate - CHETHAN B

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Jayant Banerji , Rajesh Rai K

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matter/S

    Jayant Banerji , Rajesh Rai K

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Jayant Banerji,rajesh Rai KView PDF

    Summary: The case was adjourned and relisted for 06.04.2026. The respondent raised an objection that the appeal was filed four days beyond the prescribed time limit, and the court directed the office to submit a report on this delay objection for consideration at the next hearing. In the meantime, the appellant's counsel was directed to serve a copy of the appeal on the respondent's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MFA/1056/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The case was adjourned and relisted for 06.04.2026. The respondent raised an objection that the appeal was filed four days beyond the prescribed time limit, and the court directed the office to submit a report on this delay objection for consideration at the next hearing. In the meantime, the appellant's counsel was directed to serve a copy of the appeal on the respondent's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case