SRI. K. M. UDAY vs SMT. SURABHI RAGHU — CRL.A/347/2025

Case under None Section none. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th June 2026.

CNR: KAHC010084232025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CRL.A/272/2025

Filing Date

05-02-2025

Registration No

CRL.A/347/2025

Registration Date

11-02-2025

Judge

S RACHAIAH

Coram

S RACHAIAH

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.A ( 110 )

Sub-Category

A-Aquittal ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

None Section none

Petitioner(s)

SRI. K. M. UDAY

Adv. SHERVIL ADAPPA

Respondent(s)

SMT. SURABHI RAGHU

Hearing History

Judge: S RACHAIAH

12-02-2025

NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME

Orders

09-06-2026
S RACHAIAH

Case Summary: CRL.A No. 347/2025 The High Court of Karnataka dismissed appellant K. M. Uday's appeal challenging an acquittal order by transferring it to the jurisdictional Sessions Court. The court held that under Section 372 of the CrPC (as interpreted by the Supreme Court in *Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran*), a victim-complainant must file appeals against acquittal before the Sessions Court, not the High Court. Accordingly, the High Court lacked jurisdiction and transferred the matter for hearing on July 2, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRL.A No. 347/2025 The High Court of Karnataka dismissed appellant K. M. Uday's appeal challenging an acquittal order by transferring it to the jurisdictional Sessions Court. The court held that under Section 372 of the CrPC (as interpreted by the Supreme Court in *Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran*), a victim-complainant must file appeals against acquittal before the Sessions Court, not the High Court. Accordingly, the High Court lacked jurisdiction and transferred the matter for hearing on July 2, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case