SRI. RAGHAVENDRA M P vs SRI. RANJIT KUMAR C Advocate - PRADEEP NAIK K — CRL.RP/192/2026

Case under None Section NONE. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th June 2026.

CNR: KAHC010070832026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CRL.RP/192/2026

Filing Date

28-01-2026

Registration No

CRL.RP/192/2026

Registration Date

31-01-2026

Judge

H.P.SANDESH

Coram

H.P.SANDESH

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.RP ( 114 )

Sub-Category

397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)-U/S 397/-U/S 438 ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

None Section NONE

Petitioner(s)

SRI. RAGHAVENDRA M P

Adv. SOMEGOWDA A. N.

Respondent(s)

SRI. RANJIT KUMAR C Advocate - PRADEEP NAIK K

Hearing History

Judge: H.P.SANDESH

05-02-2026

ADMISSION

Orders

09-06-2026
H.P.SANDESH

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Raghavendra M P against his conviction and sentencing (₹2,32,400 fine with 3 months default imprisonment) confirmed by the appellate court on 23.10.2025. The court dismissed the petition because Raghavendra failed to comply with a conditional order dated 05.02.2026 regarding settlement proceedings and did not submit required compliance material, making the petition not yet admissible for consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Raghavendra M P against his conviction and sentencing (₹2,32,400 fine with 3 months default imprisonment) confirmed by the appellate court on 23.10.2025. The court dismissed the petition because Raghavendra failed to comply with a conditional order dated 05.02.2026 regarding settlement proceedings and did not submit required compliance material, making the petition not yet admissible for consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case