SRI. P A MANJUNATH vs MAMATHA Advocate - MUNIRAJU K — CRP/63/2025

Case under None Section NONE. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010049682025

Filing Number

CRP/61/2025

Filing Date

22-Jan-2025

Registration No

CRP/63/2025

Registration Date

23-Jan-2025

Judge

M.nagaprasanna

Coram

M.nagaprasanna

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRP ( 108 )

Sub-Category

IO-Interim Orders (U/s 115 of CPC) ( 31 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

None Section NONE

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI. P A MANJUNATH

    Adv. MURALI N

  2. 2.SMT. VANAJAKASHI

  3. 3.SMT. ASWINI P.M

  4. 4.SMT. NAVEEN P M

  5. 5.SRI. SURENDRA P.M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAMATHA Advocate - MUNIRAJU K

  2. 2.BABY PARINITHA B

    Adv. MUNIRAJU K

  3. 3.BABY LIKITHA B

    Adv. MUNIRAJU K

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    M.nagaprasannaView PDF

    Summary of CRP/63/2025 The High Court of Karnataka allowed the civil revision petition and rejected the plaintiffs' suit for partition. The court held that the suit was barred by limitation and lacked a sustainable cause of action, as it attempted to reopen a registered partition deed from 2004 (executed 20 years prior) to which the deceased husband and father of the plaintiffs was himself a signatory. The court found the plaintiffs' claim that they were unaware of the partition deed implausible and ruled that the suit constituted an abuse of judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Further Hearing

    M.nagaprasanna

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Further Hearing

    M.nagaprasanna

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Further Hearing

    M.nagaprasanna

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Further Hearing

    M.nagaprasanna

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Dictating Orders

    M.nagaprasanna

  8. 26-Sep-2025

    Admission

    M.nagaprasanna

  9. 17-Sep-2025

    Admission

    M.nagaprasanna

  10. 25-Jul-2025

    Admission

    M.nagaprasanna

  11. 17-Jul-2025

    Admission

    M.nagaprasanna

  12. 03-Jul-2025

    Admission

    M.nagaprasanna

  13. 20-Feb-2025

    Orders

    R Devdas

  14. 25-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 22-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP/63/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRP/63/2025 The High Court of Karnataka allowed the civil revision petition and rejected the plaintiffs' suit for partition. The court held that the suit was barred by limitation and lacked a sustainable cause of action, as it attempted to reopen a registered partition deed from 2004 (executed 20 years prior) to which the deceased husband and father of the plaintiffs was himself a signatory. The court found the plaintiffs' claim that they were unaware of the partition deed implausible and ruled that the suit constituted an abuse of judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case