SRI PREM SINGH vs THE COMMISSIONER — RP/24/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section none. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 26th March 2026.
CNR: KAHC010038352026
Filing Number
RP/21/2026
Filing Date
17-Jan-2026
Registration No
RP/24/2026
Registration Date
19-Jan-2026
Judge
D K Singh , Tara Vitasta Ganju
Coram
D K Singh , Tara Vitasta Ganju
Bench Type
Division Bench
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI PREM SINGH
Adv. DHARMA VEER SINGH B,DHARMA VEER SINGH B,DHARMA VEER SINGH B, ,DHARMA VEER SINGH B
-
2.SMT. BEEJAKSHARI VARMAN,
-
3.SRI. SAHIL VARMAN,
Adv. DHARMA VEER SINGH B
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE COMMISSIONER
-
2.THE HONBLE JUSTICE K N KESHAVA
-
3.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
-
4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER.
-
5.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
D K Singh,tara Vitasta GanjuView PDF
Summary The High Court of Karnataka dismissed both a Review Petition and a Writ Petition concerning land acquisition for the Arkavathi Layout project in Bangalore. The court held that landowners Prem Singh, Beejakshari Varman, and Sahil Varman, who earlier filed a "no objection" memo to land acquisition and sought compensation, could not subsequently seek deletion of their 26-acre property from the acquisition process 7-8 years later. The court found their deletion was unauthorized and contrary to prior Division Bench directions, restoring the lands to the Bangalore Development Authority for layout formation and site allotment to waiting applicants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Feb-2026
Admission
D K Singh , Tara Vitasta Ganju
-
02-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. RP/24/2026
Summary The High Court of Karnataka dismissed both a Review Petition and a Writ Petition concerning land acquisition for the Arkavathi Layout project in Bangalore. The court held that landowners Prem Singh, Beejakshari Varman, and Sahil Varman, who earlier filed a "no objection" memo to land acquisition and sought compensation, could not subsequently seek deletion of their 26-acre property from the acquisition process 7-8 years later. The court found their deletion was unauthorized and contrary to prior Division Bench directions, restoring the lands to the Bangalore Development Authority for layout formation and site allotment to waiting applicants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts