SNEHA SOUHARDA SPORTS AND RECREATION CLUB vs SRI.MALLIKARJUNA BALDANDI — CCC/59/2026

Case under The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 14301. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010034382026

Filing Number

CCC/59/2026

Filing Date

14-Jan-2026

Registration No

CCC/59/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Judge

Chief Justice , K.S. Hemalekha

Coram

Chief Justice , K.S. Hemalekha

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 14301

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SNEHA SOUHARDA SPORTS AND RECREATION CLUB

    Adv. MAHENDRA B. S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI.MALLIKARJUNA BALDANDI

  2. 2.RAJANNA

  3. 3.SHASHI KUAMR

  4. 4.SHASHIKUMAR

  5. 5.STATE OF KARNATAKA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Chief Justice,k.s. HemalekhaView PDF

    Case Summary: CCC No. 59 of 2026 The Karnataka High Court dismissed a civil contempt petition filed by Sneha Souharda Sports and Recreation Club against police officers for alleged disobedience of an order dated 03.07.2025 from Writ Petition No. 18025/2025. The court found that the prior order contained no specific, enforceable directions—only general statements that police may inquire into lawful activities if they suspect law violations. The court held that routine police action cannot constitute willful disobedience without clear, specific court directions, and accordingly closed the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Jan-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time

    Registrar (Protocol And Hospitality)

  4. 14-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CCC/59/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CCC No. 59 of 2026 The Karnataka High Court dismissed a civil contempt petition filed by Sneha Souharda Sports and Recreation Club against police officers for alleged disobedience of an order dated 03.07.2025 from Writ Petition No. 18025/2025. The court found that the prior order contained no specific, enforceable directions—only general statements that police may inquire into lawful activities if they suspect law violations. The court held that routine police action cannot constitute willful disobedience without clear, specific court directions, and accordingly closed the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case