SNEHA SOUHARDA SPORTS AND RECREATION CLUB vs SRI.MALLIKARJUNA BALDANDI — CCC/59/2026
Case under The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 14301. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC010034382026
Filing Number
CCC/59/2026
Filing Date
14-01-2026
Registration No
CCC/59/2026
Registration Date
19-01-2026
Judge
CHIEF JUSTICE , K.S. HEMALEKHA
Coram
CHIEF JUSTICE , K.S. HEMALEKHA
Bench Type
Division Bench
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SNEHA SOUHARDA SPORTS AND RECREATION CLUB
Adv. MAHENDRA B. S
Respondent(s)
SRI.MALLIKARJUNA BALDANDI
RAJANNA
SHASHI KUAMR
SHASHIKUMAR
STATE OF KARNATAKA
Hearing History
Judge: CHIEF JUSTICE , K.S. HEMALEKHA
NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-01-2026 | NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME |
Orders
Case Summary: CCC No. 59 of 2026 The Karnataka High Court dismissed a civil contempt petition filed by Sneha Souharda Sports and Recreation Club against police officers for alleged disobedience of an order dated 03.07.2025 from Writ Petition No. 18025/2025. The court found that the prior order contained no specific, enforceable directions—only general statements that police may inquire into lawful activities if they suspect law violations. The court held that routine police action cannot constitute willful disobedience without clear, specific court directions, and accordingly closed the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CCC No. 59 of 2026 The Karnataka High Court dismissed a civil contempt petition filed by Sneha Souharda Sports and Recreation Club against police officers for alleged disobedience of an order dated 03.07.2025 from Writ Petition No. 18025/2025. The court found that the prior order contained no specific, enforceable directions—only general statements that police may inquire into lawful activities if they suspect law violations. The court held that routine police action cannot constitute willful disobedience without clear, specific court directions, and accordingly closed the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts