SMT PADMA H L vs RAMESH H B — MFA/299/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
CNR: KAHC010015762025
Filing Number
MFA/315/2025
Filing Date
08-Jan-2025
Registration No
MFA/299/2025
Registration Date
10-Jan-2025
Judge
Shivashankar Amarannavar
Coram
Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MFA ( 124 )
Sub-Category
CA-Claimants Appeal ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT PADMA H L
Adv. SANATH KUMARA. K.M
-
2.M. YASHASHWINI. B.M,
-
3.TANUSHREE. B.M,
-
4.. RUTHVIK GOWDA. B.M,
-
5.SMT. SAKAMMA,
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMESH H B
-
2.THE BRANCH MANAGER,
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jul-2026
Hearing - Interlocutory Appln
Shivashankar Amarannavar
-
09-Jun-2026
Shivashankar AmarannavarView PDF
Case Summary: MFA 299/2025 The High Court of Karnataka allowed an interim application (I.A.No.1/2025) filed by petitioners Smt Padma H L and others seeking condonation of 932 days delay in filing their appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Justice Shivashankar Amarannavar, satisfied with the cause shown in the affidavit, condoned the delay while denying interest for the delay period. The matter is listed for further hearing on 03.07.2026, with appellants directed to serve copies of appeal papers to respondent No.2's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. MFA/299/2025
Case Summary: MFA 299/2025 The High Court of Karnataka allowed an interim application (I.A.No.1/2025) filed by petitioners Smt Padma H L and others seeking condonation of 932 days delay in filing their appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Justice Shivashankar Amarannavar, satisfied with the cause shown in the affidavit, condoned the delay while denying interest for the delay period. The matter is listed for further hearing on 03.07.2026, with appellants directed to serve copies of appeal papers to respondent No.2's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts