KANTA SHARMA GAGAN KOHLI vs UNION OF INDIA TH. MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS AND ORS — OWP/2593/2018
Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 1A. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
CNR: JKHC020109532018
Next Hearing
08th July 2026
Filing Number
OWP/9363/2018
Filing Date
18-12-2018
Registration No
OWP/2593/2018
Registration Date
18-12-2018
Judge
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Coram
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
OTHER COMPENSATION MATTERS ( OTHER THAN LAND ACUISITION ACT AND MOTOR VEHICLE ACT) ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANTA SHARMA GAGAN KOHLI
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA TH. MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS AND ORS
Adv. SUNEEL MALHOTRA, CGSC 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-12-2018 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
| 08-07-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
| 06-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
| 01-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
| 11-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
Orders
Case Summary: OWP/2593/2018 Kanta Sharma v. Union of India (High Court of Jammu & Kashmir, Jammu) The case was adjourned to 08.07.2026. Respondents 1 and 3 have filed replies. Respondents 2 and 4 were granted a final four-week extension to file their replies with advance copies to opposing counsel. The Registry was directed to report on the service status of respondents 5 and 6, who were instructed to file any replies meanwhile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OWP/2593/2018 Kanta Sharma v. Union of India (High Court of Jammu & Kashmir, Jammu) The case was adjourned to 08.07.2026. Respondents 1 and 3 have filed replies. Respondents 2 and 4 were granted a final four-week extension to file their replies with advance copies to opposing counsel. The Registry was directed to report on the service status of respondents 5 and 6, who were instructed to file any replies meanwhile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts