GHULAM MUSTAFA AND ANR. MOHD SHABIR vs STATE TH.P.H.E.DEPTT.AND ORS. — SWP/2571/2018

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Dec-2018

CNR: JKHC020109452018

Filing Number

SWP/9357/2018

Filing Date

18-Dec-2018

Registration No

SWP/2571/2018

Registration Date

18-Dec-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GHULAM MUSTAFA AND ANR. MOHD SHABIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE TH.P.H.E.DEPTT.AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: SWP 2571/2018 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition filed by Ghulam Mustafa and another against the State of J&K for non-prosecution. After over seven years since notice was issued in December 2018, the petitioners failed to effect service on respondents, did not appear before the court, and abandoned the case. The court vacated any interim directions that may have been subsisting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Dec-2018

    For Admission After Notice

  4. 18-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. SWP/2571/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SWP 2571/2018 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition filed by Ghulam Mustafa and another against the State of J&K for non-prosecution. After over seven years since notice was issued in December 2018, the petitioners failed to effect service on respondents, did not appear before the court, and abandoned the case. The court vacated any interim directions that may have been subsisting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case