AFZAL-UL-REHMAN SUYASH SINGH CHANDEL vs DILBAGH SINGH D.G.P.JAMMU — CPSW/755/2018

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Dec-2018

CNR: JKHC020107242018

Filing Number

CPSW/9184/2018

Filing Date

10-Dec-2018

Registration No

CPSW/755/2018

Registration Date

18-Dec-2018

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AFZAL-UL-REHMAN SUYASH SINGH CHANDEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DILBAGH SINGH D.G.P.JAMMU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Afzal-ul-Rehman's contempt petition against respondent authorities for alleged non-compliance with a December 2016 interim order. The court found that the respondents had actually complied with the direction to consider the petitioner's representation, passing order No. 1776 of 2020 rejecting the petitioner's claim as meritless. Since the main case was transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal in November 2021 and the petitioner failed to clarify the current status after nine years, the court disposed of the contempt petition as infructuous, having no substantive merit remaining. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Dec-2018

    For Orders After Notice

  4. 10-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/755/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Afzal-ul-Rehman's contempt petition against respondent authorities for alleged non-compliance with a December 2016 interim order. The court found that the respondents had actually complied with the direction to consider the petitioner's representation, passing order No. 1776 of 2020 rejecting the petitioner's claim as meritless. Since the main case was transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal in November 2021 and the petitioner failed to clarify the current status after nine years, the court disposed of the contempt petition as infructuous, having no substantive merit remaining. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case