RAVINDER KUMAR R KOUL vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS. — SWP/2998/2017
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution on 01st April 2026.
CNR: JKHC020104162017
Filing Number
SWP/27323/2017
Filing Date
22-Dec-2017
Registration No
SWP/2998/2017
Registration Date
22-Dec-2017
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution
Last updated 30-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVINDER KUMAR R KOUL
Respondent(s)
-
1.PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a Special Writ Petition (SWP No. 2998/2017) filed by Ravinder Kumar against Punjab National Bank for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear at hearings and did not serve the respondents, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the matter. All interim directions, if any, were vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
16-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal
-
11-Feb-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Yaqoob Mir
-
26-Dec-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2017
Case filed
Registration No. SWP/2998/2017
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a Special Writ Petition (SWP No. 2998/2017) filed by Ravinder Kumar against Punjab National Bank for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear at hearings and did not serve the respondents, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the matter. All interim directions, if any, were vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts