YOG RAJ SINGH AND ORS. AJAY ABROL vs STATE TH.P.H.E. DEPTT.AND ORS. — SWP/1022/2014

Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th July 2025.

Case disposed Next hearing 26-Sep-2014

CNR: JKHC020096092014

Filing Number

SWP/6455/2014

Filing Date

19-Apr-2014

Registration No

SWP/1022/2014

Registration Date

19-Apr-2014

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma Chowdhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma Chowdhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

07-Jul-2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 23-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YOG RAJ SINGH AND ORS. AJAY ABROL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE TH.P.H.E. DEPTT.AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul BhartiView PDF

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul BhartiView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed a writ petition for service regularization that was pending since 2014, but instead of restoring it, granted the petitioners liberty to file an Original Application before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Jammu Bench within 30 days. The Court ruled that time spent during the High Court proceedings shall not be counted against the petitioners' CAT application, recognizing that service-related matters now fall exclusively under CAT jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma ChowdharyView PDF

  5. 07-Jul-2025

    For Admission After Notice

  6. 26-Sep-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Apr-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. SWP/1022/2014

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed a writ petition for service regularization that was pending since 2014, but instead of restoring it, granted the petitioners liberty to file an Original Application before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Jammu Bench within 30 days. The Court ruled that time spent during the High Court proceedings shall not be counted against the petitioners' CAT application, recognizing that service-related matters now fall exclusively under CAT jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case