GHULAM SARWAR M I SHERKHAN vs STATE OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECY. FOREST DEPTT. AND ORS — SWP/2141/2018

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Oct-2018

CNR: JKHC020089632018

Filing Number

SWP/7648/2018

Filing Date

16-Oct-2018

Registration No

SWP/2141/2018

Registration Date

16-Oct-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GHULAM SARWAR M I SHERKHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECY. FOREST DEPTT. AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Ghulam Sarwar's petition for non-prosecution on May 8, 2026, after it remained pending since 2018 with repeated adjournments requested by the petitioner's counsel and no appearance on the final hearing date. The court noted that the petitioner's grievance appears to have been redressed by the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission After Notice

    Registrar Judicial

  4. 17-Oct-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. SWP/2141/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Ghulam Sarwar's petition for non-prosecution on May 8, 2026, after it remained pending since 2018 with repeated adjournments requested by the petitioner's counsel and no appearance on the final hearing date. The court noted that the petitioner's grievance appears to have been redressed by the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case