MOHD.SHAFI AND ORS. RAKESH SHARMA vs ASHOK SHARMA EXE.ENGI.P.H.E.AND ANR. — CPSW/449/2016

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2017

CNR: JKHC020088372016

Filing Number

CPSW/17774/2016

Filing Date

30-Nov-2016

Registration No

CPSW/449/2016

Registration Date

30-Nov-2016

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD.SHAFI AND ORS. RAKESH SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK SHARMA EXE.ENGI.P.H.E.AND ANR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the contempt petition filed by Mohd. Shafi and others for non-prosecution. The petitioners sought contempt proceedings against authorities for non-compliance with an April 2016 order directing consideration of their claims, but the petition remained pending for a decade with no representation from the petitioners and inability to serve notice on respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Filing Fresh Particulars And Rc

    Registrar Judicial

  4. 07-Apr-2017

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur

  5. 24-Mar-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Nov-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/449/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the contempt petition filed by Mohd. Shafi and others for non-prosecution. The petitioners sought contempt proceedings against authorities for non-compliance with an April 2016 order directing consideration of their claims, but the petition remained pending for a decade with no representation from the petitioners and inability to serve notice on respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case