MOHD.HUSSAIN M S CHOWDHARY vs STATE TH.SCHOOL EDU.DEPTT.AND ORS. — SWP/2106/2018
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC020088082018
Filing Number
SWP/7520/2018
Filing Date
11-Oct-2018
Registration No
SWP/2106/2018
Registration Date
11-Oct-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHD.HUSSAIN M S CHOWDHARY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE TH.SCHOOL EDU.DEPTT.AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition filed by Mohd. Hussain against the State for non-prosecution. The petition, pending since October 2018, was dismissed because the petitioner failed to appear for three consecutive hearings and did not take steps to serve the respondents despite over seven years passing. The court also vacated any interim directions that may have been subsisting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
16-Apr-2019
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma
-
12-Feb-2019
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu SharmaView PDF
-
12-Feb-2019
For Orders After Notice
Lok Adalat
-
22-Nov-2018
For Filing Fresh Particulars And Rc
Registrar Judicial
-
24-Oct-2018
For Filing Fresh Particulars And Rc
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma
-
12-Oct-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Oct-2018
Case filed
Registration No. SWP/2106/2018
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition filed by Mohd. Hussain against the State for non-prosecution. The petition, pending since October 2018, was dismissed because the petitioner failed to appear for three consecutive hearings and did not take steps to serve the respondents despite over seven years passing. The court also vacated any interim directions that may have been subsisting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts