SATISH KUMAR SUDERSHAN SHARMA vs STATE OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECY. P.H.E ,IFC DEPTT. AND ORS — SWP/2051/2018

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JKHC020084992018

Filing Number

SWP/7262/2018

Filing Date

01-Oct-2018

Registration No

SWP/2051/2018

Registration Date

03-Oct-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATISH KUMAR SUDERSHAN SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECY. P.H.E ,IFC DEPTT. AND ORS

    Adv. LAKSH PURI,MONIKA KOHLI 1123

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF

    Case Summary (SWP 2051/2018): The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir found that Satish Kumar's writ petition concerning the seniority of Engineers in the Department of PHE/Jal Shakti falls within the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal rather than the High Court. The petition was accordingly transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench, for further proceedings with notice to both parties. The case was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Oct-2018

    For Admission After Notice

  4. 01-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. SWP/2051/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (SWP 2051/2018): The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir found that Satish Kumar's writ petition concerning the seniority of Engineers in the Department of PHE/Jal Shakti falls within the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal rather than the High Court. The petition was accordingly transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench, for further proceedings with notice to both parties. The case was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case