ANITA KUMARI AND ORS. RANI KIYALA, BHANU SINGH SLATHIA vs R.K.GUPTA,SECY.FOREST AND ORS. — CPSW/275/2016

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Sep-2016

CNR: JKHC020084222016

Filing Number

CPSW/9882/2016

Filing Date

15-Jul-2016

Registration No

CPSW/275/2016

Registration Date

15-Jul-2016

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 27-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANITA KUMARI AND ORS. RANI KIYALA, BHANU SINGH SLATHIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R.K.GUPTA,SECY.FOREST AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the contempt petition filed by Anita Kumari and others against Forest Department authorities. The court found that the respondents had complied with the earlier order by considering the petitioners' regularization claim, and correctly concluded via SF Order No.272 (15-11-2016) that the petitioners were not entitled to regularization as they were engaged only for a specific project with a fixed duration. The petition was disposed of as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur

  4. 22-Sep-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Jul-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/275/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the contempt petition filed by Anita Kumari and others against Forest Department authorities. The court found that the respondents had complied with the earlier order by considering the petitioners' regularization claim, and correctly concluded via SF Order No.272 (15-11-2016) that the petitioners were not entitled to regularization as they were engaged only for a specific project with a fixed duration. The petition was disposed of as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case