SUMANJI SHARMA SUDERSHAN SHARMA vs STATE OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECY . REVENUE DEPTT. AND ANR — SWP/1889/2018

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-Sep-2018

CNR: JKHC020078852018

Filing Number

SWP/6755/2018

Filing Date

14-Sep-2018

Registration No

SWP/1889/2018

Registration Date

14-Sep-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMANJI SHARMA SUDERSHAN SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECY . REVENUE DEPTT. AND ANR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF

    The petition challenging Government Order No. 159-Rev(Gaz) of 2018 was dismissed for non-prosecution. The court found that the petitioner had not pursued the matter since 2018, failed to appear when called, and appeared to be benefiting from interim relief while showing no genuine interest in prosecuting the case. All interim directions were vacated upon dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Filing Objections/Reply/Response

    Registrar Judicial

  4. 17-Sep-2018

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

  5. 14-Sep-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 14-Sep-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. SWP/1889/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The petition challenging Government Order No. 159-Rev(Gaz) of 2018 was dismissed for non-prosecution. The court found that the petitioner had not pursued the matter since 2018, failed to appear when called, and appeared to be benefiting from interim relief while showing no genuine interest in prosecuting the case. All interim directions were vacated upon dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case