MOHD.AYOUB I H BHAT, R K S THAKUR vs SURESH GUPTA,M.D.STATE FOREST CORPORATIO — CPSW/39/2017

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-Apr-2017

CNR: JKHC020078782017

Filing Number

CPSW/725/2017

Filing Date

03-Feb-2017

Registration No

CPSW/39/2017

Registration Date

03-Feb-2017

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD.AYOUB I H BHAT, R K S THAKUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURESH GUPTA,M.D.STATE FOREST CORPORATIO

    Adv. ROHIT KAPOOR AAG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary of CPSW No. 39/2017 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner sought contempt proceedings against authorities for allegedly violating a 2015 court order directing sympathetic consideration of his compassionate appointment claim. However, the respondent's compliance report showed the claim was time-barred and ex-gratia relief had already been provided to the deceased official's family, rendering the petitioner ineligible. With no representation from the petitioner after nearly a decade of pending proceedings, the court found no substantive issue remaining and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.s.walia

  4. 01-Apr-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Feb-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/39/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CPSW No. 39/2017 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner sought contempt proceedings against authorities for allegedly violating a 2015 court order directing sympathetic consideration of his compassionate appointment claim. However, the respondent's compliance report showed the claim was time-barred and ex-gratia relief had already been provided to the deceased official's family, rendering the petitioner ineligible. With no representation from the petitioner after nearly a decade of pending proceedings, the court found no substantive issue remaining and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case