SUVERCHA SHARMA MONIKA KOHLI vs SHAKEEL UL REHMAN,SECY.J.K.P.S.C. — CPSW/63/2017

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 25-Aug-2017

CNR: JKHC020078392017

Filing Number

CPSW/1375/2017

Filing Date

13-Feb-2017

Registration No

CPSW/63/2017

Registration Date

13-Feb-2017

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUVERCHA SHARMA MONIKA KOHLI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAKEEL UL REHMAN,SECY.J.K.P.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: Petitioner Suvercha Sharma sought contempt proceedings against respondent authorities for violating an interim order (December 8, 2016) that permitted her to appear in an interview. However, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, noting that the underlying case had been transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal on February 8, 2022, and the petitioner failed to appear to demonstrate whether the dispute still survived. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

  4. 25-Aug-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/63/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Petitioner Suvercha Sharma sought contempt proceedings against respondent authorities for violating an interim order (December 8, 2016) that permitted her to appear in an interview. However, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, noting that the underlying case had been transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal on February 8, 2022, and the petitioner failed to appear to demonstrate whether the dispute still survived. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case